Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Connecting Learning Theories with Instruction


It is amazing to find myself nearing the completion of another course towards my Master’s Degree in Education from Walden University.  It is even more amazing to look through my notes from the past seven weeks and review all of information that has been covered, learned, and in my case, possibly re-learned from years ago.  Prior to the start of this course, the title alone, Bridging Learning Theory and Instruction, had me confused.  Now, not only do I better understand the name of the course and the material covered, but also the impact such knowledge can have in the classroom and student achievement.

            At the start of class I felt very strongly about constructionism as the primary learning theory.  While I still recognize that giving students the opportunity to construct their own knowledge has a powerful impact on their learning experiences, I have gained a deeper appreciation for the cognitive learning theory (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011a).  With this knowledge I aim to provide students will stronger opportunities to connect new knowledge to previous experiences, allowing students to make connections in their brains upon encountering new information (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011a).
            Knowing and understanding learning theories and using appropriate instructional strategies that incorporate technology can have a positive impact on students and their educational experience (Pitler, Hubell, & Kuhn, 2012).  Understanding how the brain processes information helps a teacher determine the best approach to instruction (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011b).  Some lessons are best served through repetition and reward while others work best with active student engagement.  Having knowledge of technology resources to match learning theories brings about improved experiences and instruction for students. 
           
           
            As a result of what I have learned regarding learning theories, instructional strategies and the use of technology, my goal for integrating more technology into my classroom is to plan more cooperative and collaborative learning experiences for my students.  Providing students with the opportunity to build music artifacts demonstrates their growth and understanding about music. These experiences engage them in their learning and help deepen their understandings (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011c).  
            Storybook and Voice Thread are new technology tools that I plan on using with my students, along with continued use of Power Point.  These tools provide students with an opportunity to offer their reactions to music in linguistic and non-linguistic form.  This opportunity for dual-coding, as developed by Paivio, enables students to view a graphic representation along with written text, which strengthens their ability to understand new material (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011a).
            Lecture and direct instruction from the teacher are the least effective means of instruction because they lack student involvement and engagement (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011d).  I have become familiar with strategies that I had never considered being a part of my instruction process, and am equipped with technology tools to implement them.  More importantly, these strategies are tied to learning theories, supporting the need for students to be a part of their learning experiences.

            Through the use of Power Point or the Storybook app for the iPad, I would like to have students create a multi-media presentation that explains the meaning of the lyrics of the Star Spangled Banner. In second grade, music students sing verse one, however, many of the words and phrases to this 200-year-old song are difficult for them to understand.  I discuss the history of the song and offer them my explanations and interpretations.  In third grade, I would like to have the students create a slide show of their interpretation of the meaning of the lyrics to verse one, then in fourth grade add more slides with their explanation of verse two, and in fifth grade add verse three to their presentation.  I would like to burn their presentation to a disc that each student could take home with them as they leave the elementary at the end of fifth grade, as a memento of elementary school. 
            Another addition I would like to make using technology in my classroom is having students work more with composition software.  We frequently discuss what we hear and see in music regarding pitch, rhythm, form, tempo, dynamics, and tone color, but I would like to provide students with the opportunity to construct their own music, working with these elements in a way that is meaningful to them.  Making decisions about which pitches and rhythms to use could help build a greater understanding of the terms and their importance in musical compositions.  Assigning a composition project once a quarter would be the best way to begin working with this new technology.  A rubric would be presented to the students helping them understand the required elements such as time signature, number of measures, note values to be used, and other basic musical parameters.  As the students’ experience with composition grows, more elements can be added.  The advantage of using technology for composition is that the students can have immediate feedback, hearing the sound of their piece, and easily make any changes or corrections to their project.

            Technology cannot replace quality instruction but it certainly can help a valuable tool enabling teachers to help students reach greater heights of academic understanding and accomplishment.
           
References:
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011a). Program five: Cognitive learning theory [Video webcast]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and technology. Retrieved from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=laureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011b). Program one: Understanding the brain [Video webcast]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and technology. Retrieved from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=laureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011c). Program seven: Constructionist and constructivist learning theories [Video webcast]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and technology. Retrieved from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=laureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011d). Program thirteen: Technology: Instructional tool vs. learning tool [Video webcast]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and technology. Retrieved from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=laureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1

Pitler, H., Hubbell, E. & Kuhn, M., (2012). Using technology with classroom instruction that             works (2nd ed.). Denver, Colorado: McRel.

No comments:

Post a Comment